GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade)
Category
Related Terms
Browse by Category
What Is GATT?
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was a legal agreement between many countries, whose overall purpose was to promote international trade by reducing or eliminating trade barriers such as tariffs or quotas.
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was a multilateral treaty created in 1947 to regulate international trade and reduce protectionist measures that had stifled the global economy prior to World War II. For nearly 50 years, GATT served as the de facto international organization for trade, providing a forum for member nations to negotiate tariff reductions and resolve disputes. Unlike a formal international organization with a permanent structure, GATT began as a provisional agreement. It was originally intended to be part of the International Trade Organization (ITO), a specialized agency of the United Nations. When the ITO charter was not ratified by the United States and other key nations, GATT remained the only multilateral instrument governing international trade from 1948 until the World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1995. GATT's influence on the global economy was profound. Through eight rounds of multilateral trade negotiations, it succeeded in lowering the average tariff on industrial goods in developed countries from about 40% in 1947 to less than 4% by the time it was superseded. By establishing rules against discriminatory trade practices, it provided a predictable environment that encouraged businesses to invest and trade across borders.
Key Takeaways
- Signed in 1947, GATT was intended to boost economic recovery after World War II through reconstructing and liberalizing global trade.
- Its primary mechanism was the substantial reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.
- GATT operated through a series of trade negotiation rounds, the most significant being the Uruguay Round (1986–1994).
- The agreement established the principles of Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment and National Treatment to prevent discrimination in trade.
- GATT was replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, which absorbed and expanded its principles.
- While no longer the primary governing body, GATT 1994 remains a foundational treaty under the WTO framework for trade in goods.
How GATT Works
GATT functioned through a series of "rounds" or negotiating sessions where member countries agreed to reduce tariffs and bind them at lower levels. The core of the agreement relied on two fundamental principles of non-discrimination: First, the **Most-Favored-Nation (MFN)** principle required that any trade advantage, privilege, or immunity granted by a contracting party to any product originating in or destined for any other country be accorded immediately and unconditionally to the like product of all other contracting parties. Effectively, if a country lowered a tariff for one trading partner, it had to lower it for all GATT members. Second, the **National Treatment** principle stipulated that once imported goods entered the market, they must be treated no less favorably than "like" domestically produced goods. This prevented countries from using domestic taxes or regulations to protect local industries from foreign competition after tariffs had been paid. Disputes under GATT were handled through a consultation and panel process. If a member believed another was violating the agreement, they could request a panel of experts to adjudicate. However, the pre-1995 dispute settlement system had significant weaknesses; notably, a losing party could block the adoption of a panel ruling, a flaw that was corrected with the formation of the WTO.
Key Elements of GATT
GATT was built on several pillars designed to liberalize trade while allowing for specific exceptions. **Tariff Binding:** Countries committed to "bound" tariff rates, which acted as ceilings. A country could apply a tariff lower than the bound rate but could not raise it above that level without compensating affected trading partners. This created certainty for exporters and importers. **Quantitative Restrictions:** Generally, GATT prohibited the use of quotas (limits on the quantity of imports), preferring tariffs as a more transparent form of protection. Exceptions were allowed for balance-of-payments difficulties or developing nations. **Anti-Dumping and Subsidies:** The agreement allowed countries to take action against "dumping" (selling goods below fair market value) and prohibited export subsidies on industrial goods, recognizing that these practices could distort fair competition.
Important Considerations
While GATT was successful in reducing tariffs, it had limitations that modern traders and economists must recognize. It primarily covered trade in goods, leaving significant sectors like services (banking, insurance, telecommunications) and intellectual property largely unregulated internationally until the Uruguay Round. The dispute settlement mechanism was consensus-based, meaning a single country could veto a ruling against itself. This sometimes allowed trade wars to escalate when nations refused to comply with panel findings. Furthermore, sectors like agriculture and textiles were often exempted from standard GATT rules, allowing protectionism to persist in these sensitive industries for decades. Today, "GATT 1994" exists as one of the agreements under the WTO umbrella, specifically governing trade in goods, while the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) cover other areas.
Real-World Example: The Uruguay Round
The Uruguay Round (1986–1994) was the definitive example of GATT's mechanism in action and its largest negotiation. It involved 123 countries and covered almost all trade, from toothbrushes to pleasure boats, from banking to telecommunications, and from the genes of wild rice to AIDS treatments. A key outcome was the agreement to replace agricultural quotas with tariffs (tariffication) and then reduce those tariffs. For example, Japan agreed to open its strictly protected rice market, while the U.S. and Europe agreed to cut agricultural subsidies.
GATT vs. WTO
Understanding the transition from GATT to the WTO is crucial for trade history.
| Feature | GATT (1947-1994) | WTO (1995-Present) | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | Provisional Agreement | International Organization | WTO has legal personality and permanent institutions. |
| Scope | Trade in Goods | Goods, Services, IP | WTO covers a much broader range of commercial activity. |
| Dispute Settlement | Consensus required to adopt | Consensus required to block | WTO rulings are binding and harder to block. |
| Members | Contracting Parties | Member States | Formal membership status in the WTO. |
FAQs
Yes and no. The original 1947 agreement serves as the foundation, but it was updated and incorporated into the WTO framework as "GATT 1994." It continues to govern international trade in goods among WTO members, operating alongside other agreements that cover services and intellectual property.
GATT was a set of rules and a multilateral agreement without a permanent institutional structure. The WTO is a permanent international organization that oversees the global trade rules, administers agreements (including GATT), and settles trade disputes. The WTO absorbed GATT in 1995.
MFN is a cornerstone of GATT (and the WTO) which requires that a country treats all its trading partners equally. If a country grants a special favor (like a lower tariff rate) to one partner, it must immediately grant that same favor to all other WTO members.
GATT was created in the aftermath of World War II to prevent a return to the protectionist trade policies of the 1930s (like the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act) that contributed to the Great Depression. Its goal was to foster economic recovery and peace through interdependent, liberalized trade.
GATT evolved through a series of negotiation rounds where member countries gathered to discuss trade rules and exchange tariff concessions. The early rounds focused on lowering tariffs on goods, while later rounds (like the Kennedy, Tokyo, and Uruguay Rounds) addressed non-tariff barriers and broader trade issues.
The Bottom Line
For students of economic history and international markets, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) represents the architect of the modern global trading system. By establishing rules that replaced the "law of the jungle" with the rule of law, GATT facilitated a dramatic expansion in world trade and economic prosperity over the second half of the 20th century. While it has been institutionally superseded by the World Trade Organization, the principles codified in GATT—specifically non-discrimination and the binding of tariffs—remain the bedrock of international commerce. Understanding GATT is essential for comprehending how current trade disputes, tariffs, and WTO rulings function, as the legacy of 1947 continues to define the rules of the road for global business today.
More in International Trade
At a Glance
Key Takeaways
- Signed in 1947, GATT was intended to boost economic recovery after World War II through reconstructing and liberalizing global trade.
- Its primary mechanism was the substantial reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.
- GATT operated through a series of trade negotiation rounds, the most significant being the Uruguay Round (1986–1994).
- The agreement established the principles of Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment and National Treatment to prevent discrimination in trade.